Esto no lo digo yo ni los conspiranóicos que te sacan 120 € por acudir  a una conferencia llena de mentiras, esto lo publicó el periódico más  relevante del planeta en edición Dominical, el "NEW YORK TIMES".
.
En esta noticia acusan al F.B.I.. de preparar regularmente  AUTO-ATENTADOS y detalla el proceso, que viene a ser mas o menos así:
.
-Se escoge un chaval o confidente
.
-Agentes policiales infiltrados en grupos anti-USA les facilitan  bombas, armamento, cinturones-bomba y otras cosas.
.
-El material suministrado es FALSO (no funciona), pero ellos no lo  saben
.
-Se les da un guion y facilidades para ejecutar el atentado.
.
-En el atentado, se rumorea que el F.B.I. pone actores profesionales para  añadir dramatismo, y se encarga de que otros aparatos REALES si que  exploten.
.
-El F.B.I. ya tiene previamente el guion de los acontecimientos y el  perfil y datos de los SUPUESTOS terroristas.
.
-El F.B.I. deja unas horas o dias de suspense para ensayar situaciones de  LEY MARCIAL.
.
-Entonces detienen y se dice que torturan a los pobres tontitos que  pusieron las falsas bombas, casualmente alguno muere antes de hablar  con la prensa.
.
..
...
ESTO LO PUBLICA EL NEW YORK TIMES
.
¿Y para que todo esto?
.
-Justificar odio a otros países, invadirlos y saquearlos
.
-Establecer una "sociedad del miedo", recortar libertades y derechos
.
-Perpetuar su mayor industria, la armamentística
.
Etc., etc., etc...
.
Os dejo la noticia ORIGINAL, leerla es preocupantemente revelador de  que las sucias luchas internas de poder en U.S.A. ya no tienen límite.
.
Si el diario más patriota de ese país "LEVANTA LA MANTA" ¿que podemos  esperar luego?.
---------------------------------------------------------------
LEE LA NOTICIA ORIGINAL por favor.
.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=3&

NO PINCHES EL ENLACE, COPIA Y PEGA, si no, no funciona
.
Adjunto la transcripción, pues es probable que DESAPAREZCA de la red.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Opinion
Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.
By DAVID K. SHIPLER
Published: April 28, 2012

THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots  in recent years - or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was  intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and  shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in  Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model  planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.











Clay Rodery

But all those dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover  agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile,  fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training.  Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.

When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, thought of  using a car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony  in Portland, the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums  of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a  gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover  F.B.I. agent even did the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger  seat. To trigger the bomb the student punched a number into a  cellphone and got no boom, only a bust.

This is legal, but is it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the  culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential  terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real  ones? Judging by their official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice  Department are sure of themselves - too sure, perhaps.

Carefully orchestrated sting operations usually hold up in court.  Defendants invariably claim entrapment and almost always lose, because  the law requires that they show no predisposition to commit the crime,  even when induced by government agents. To underscore their  predisposition, many suspects are “warned about the seriousness of  their plots and given opportunities to back out,” said Dean Boyd, a  Justice Department spokesman. But not always, recorded conversations  show. Sometimes they are coaxed to continue.

Undercover operations, long practiced by the F.B.I., have become a  mainstay of counterterrorism, and they have changed in response to the  post-9/11 focus on prevention. “Prior to 9/11 it would be very unusual  for the F.B.I. to present a crime opportunity that wasn’t in the scope  of the activities that a person was already involved in,” said Mike  German of the American Civil Liberties Union, a lawyer and former  F.B.I. agent who infiltrated white supremacist groups. An alleged drug  dealer would be set up to sell drugs to an undercover agent, an arms  trafficker to sell weapons. That still happens routinely, but less so  in counterterrorism, and for good reason.

“There isn’t a business of terrorism in the United States, thank God,”  a former federal prosecutor, David Raskin, explained.

“You’re not going to be able to go to a street corner and find  somebody who’s already blown something up,” he said. Therefore, the  usual goal is not “to find somebody who’s already engaged in terrorism  but find somebody who would jump at the opportunity if a real  terrorist showed up in town.”

And that’s the gray area. Who is susceptible? Anyone who plays along  with the agents, apparently. Once the snare is set, law enforcement  sees no choice. “Ignoring such threats is not an option,” Mr. Boyd  argued, “given the possibility that the suspect could act alone at any  time or find someone else willing to help him.”

Typically, the stings initially target suspects for pure speech -  comments to an informer outside a mosque, angry postings on Web sites,  e-mails with radicals overseas - then woo them into relationships with  informers, who are often convicted felons working in exchange for  leniency, or with F.B.I. agents posing as members of Al Qaeda or other  groups.

Some targets have previous involvement in more than idle talk: for  example, Waad Ramadan Alwan, an Iraqi in Kentucky, whose fingerprints  were found on an unexploded roadside bomb near Bayji, Iraq, and Raja  Khan of Chicago, who had sent funds to an Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan.

But others seem ambivalent, incompetent and adrift, like hapless  wannabes looking for a cause that the informer or undercover agent  skillfully helps them find. Take the Stinger missile defendant James  Cromitie, a low-level drug dealer with a criminal record that included  no violence or hate crime, despite his rants against Jews. “He was  searching for answers within his Islamic faith,” said his lawyer,  Clinton W. Calhoun III, who has appealed his conviction. “And this  informant, I think, twisted that search in a really pretty awful way,  sort of misdirected Cromitie in his search and turned him towards  violence.”

THE informer, Shahed Hussain, had been charged with fraud, but avoided  prison and deportation by working undercover in another investigation.  He was being paid by the F.B.I. to pose as a wealthy Pakistani with  ties to Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group that Mr. Cromitie  apparently had never heard of before they met by chance in the parking  lot of a mosque.

“Brother, did you ever try to do anything for the cause of Islam?” Mr.  Hussain asked at one point.

“O.K., brother,” Mr. Cromitie replied warily, “where you going with  this, brother?”

Two days later, the informer told him, “Allah has more work for you to  do,” and added, “Revelation is going to come in your dreams that you  have to do this thing, O.K.?” About 15 minutes later, Mr. Hussain  proposed the idea of using missiles, saying he could get them in a  container from China. Mr. Cromitie laughed.

Reading hundreds of pages of transcripts of the recorded conversations  is like looking at the inkblots of a Rorschach test. Patterns of  willingness and hesitation overlap and merge. “I don’t want anyone to  get hurt,” Mr. Cromitie said, and then explained that he meant women  and children. “I don’t care if it’s a whole synagogue of men.” It took  11 months of meandering discussion and a promise of $250,000 to lead  him, with three co-conspirators he recruited, to plant fake bombs at  two Riverdale synagogues.

“Only the government could have made a ‘terrorist’ out of Mr.  Cromitie, whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in its scope,”  said Judge Colleen McMahon, sentencing him to 25 years. She branded it  a “fantasy terror operation” but called his attempt “beyond  despicable” and rejected his claim of entrapment.

The judge’s statement was unusual, but Mr. Cromitie’s characteristics  were not. His incompetence and ambivalence could be found among other  aspiring terrorists whose grandiose plans were nurtured by law  enforcement. They included men who wanted to attack fuel lines at  Kennedy International Airport; destroy the Sears Tower (now Willis  Tower) in Chicago; carry out a suicide bombing near Tampa Bay, Fla.,  and bomb subways in New York and Washington. Of the 22 most  frightening plans for attacks since 9/11 on American soil, 14 were  developed in sting operations.

Another New York City subway plot, which recently went to trial,  needed no help from government. Nor did a bombing attempt in Times  Square, the abortive underwear bombing in a jetliner over Detroit, a  planned attack on Fort Dix, N.J., and several smaller efforts. Some  threats are real, others less so. In terrorism, it’s not easy to tell  the difference.

David K. Shipler is the author of “Rights at Risk: The Limits of  Liberty in Modern America.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
En este Vídeo se puede ver como los hermanos chechenos detenidos por ser los terroristas de Boston
gritan
¡NOS RENDIMOS! ¡NOSOTROS NO LO HICIMOS!

y la policía responde con
DISPAROS
29 abril de 2.013

el F.B.I. y "The New York Times"
Fuente original:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoRs72KACgU&feature=player_embedded


Canal de YouTube de:  ThePiRaTeCoPy404

Parroquia San Juan Bautista:

Nada nuevo si tienes en cuenta la historia moderna de ese país, desde el acorazado Maine hasta nuestros días, pasando por Pearl Harbour, Vietnam u otros tantos acontecimientos dolosos que han servido para justificar y perpetuar ese rol de hermano mayor ó gran policia mundial que les permite dominar el mundo, como antes lo hicieran tantos otros imperios. La cuestión no es tanto si esto es así, como si permitimos que esto nos lleve por el camino del odio, la venganza o la confrontación que lleva aparejado, y nos separa del camino del amor, que en definitiva es lo que pretende quién siembra en esas grandes cabezas pensantes, astucias tan oscuras e inhumanas.

Como decía san Pablo: "Porque nuestra lucha no es contra la carne y la sangre, sino contra los Principados, contra las Potestades, contra los Dominadores de este mundo tenebroso, contra los Espíritus del Mal que están en las alturas."

Gracias por compartir. Un abrazo.
06:38 02/05/13

Edgar Punset:

Hay una BUENA NOTICIA en todo esto, el propio pueblo de U.S.A. se rebela abiertamente contra su sistema basado en la mentira y la maldad, y la revolución allí está llegando a muchos sectores... esperemos que no pase como en los 70 y los anulen a todos poniendo de moda las drogas.

Un cordial saludo y que pases un buen dia.
Wednesday
13:08 02/05/13

Parroquia San Juan Bautista:

Igualmente amigo.